Curry v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Counsel for the appellant, in challenging the correctness of» the conclusion announced in the original opinion, takes occasion to urge that the court “through the elected judges” should take cognizance of the record. Pertinent to that request and the implied assumption that the matter has not had the consideration of the elected judges, it is deemed not inappropriate that the following statement touching the pro cedure of the Court of Criminal Appeals be- embraced in this opinion: To aid the Court of Criminal Appeals, the Legislature has…