Legal Opinion

Al Roumy v. Mukasey

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 27, 2008No. 07-3328UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Said A1 Roumy seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) February 20, 2007 decision denying A1 Roumy’s motion to reopen immigration proceedings regarding A1 Roumy’s application for withholding of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3) and relief under the Convention Against Torture. A1 Roumy claims that the BIA erred in denying his motion to reopen because changed country conditions justified his untimely filing and that the ineffective assistance of counsel prevented A1 Roumy from presenting his case to the immigration judge. For the reasons…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  3. Svitlana Denko v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Julio Lozada v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  5. Kishin Ramchand Balani v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maribel Trujillo Diaz v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Mohamad Mhaidli v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Edmond Bedalli v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API