Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.
Hall and Haneman, JJ., vote to affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of judge Foley.
For reversal—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor and Schettino—5.
For affirmance—Justices Hall and Haneman—2.
2Cited by25 opinions
- Lozano v. Frank DeLuca ConstructionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Doe v. St. Michael's Med. Center, NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Phillips v. ScrimenteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Salierno v. Micro Stamping Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Sarzillo v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.