Legal Opinion

Deere & Co. v. Fimco Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 21, 2018No. CASE NO. 5:15–CV–00105–TBRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas B. Russell, Senior Judge

This matter is before the Court on various post-trial motions and briefs filed by both parties. This litigation began when Plaintiff, Deere & Company ("Deere") brought suit against Defendant FIMCO, Inc. ("FIMCO") alleging that FIMCO was acting in violation of federal trademark and common law by producing and distributing trailed agricultural sprayers and applicators bearing green and yellow colors that are indistinguishable from the green and yellow colors Deere uses on its agricultural equipment.1 Deere brought four claims against FIMCO, including those for federal trademark infringement in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. William Howe v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  3. Daddy's Junky Music Stores, Inc. v. Big Daddy's Family Music CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Homeowners Group, Inc. v. Home Marketing Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. Audi Ag and Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Bob D'amato, D/B/A Quattro EnthusiastsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  2. Servpro Intellectual Property, Inc. v. BlantonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API