Legal Opinion

United States v. Drachman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1896No. Civil No. 472PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. Joseph D. Bethune, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C. J.

This action was brought to recover $5,988.16, damages accruing to the United States by reason of Philip Drachman’s failing to comply with his bid to furnish certain supplies (hay) for the use of the government at its military post at Fort Huachuca, in this territory. The appellee Dennis was a guarantor upon the bid of said Drachman. Drachman defaulted, and failed to comply with his bid, and the government bo'ught the supplies in open market, the difference between the bid and the price paid for the supplies in open market being the amount claimed as damages *14in this suit. On the trial of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. EllisArizona Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ewing v. United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Dennis v. United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API