Legal Opinion

In re Newman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 1932PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.

This proceeding is brought, pursuant to the provisions of section 36 of the Public Officers Law, to remove Daniel F. Strobel from the office of supervisor of the town of Ohio in the county of Herkimer, for misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance or malversation in office.

Mr. Strobel objects to the sufficiency of the petition, and moves to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground that the petition fails to state facts sufficient to warrant the relief sought. That motion is now before us for decision.

Mr. Strobel is now serving his third successive term as supervisor of the town of Ohio. He was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. State v. WelshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Matter of GudenNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Hawkins v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Rankin v. JaumanIdaho Supreme Court · 1894

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sarisohn v. Appellate Division, Second Department, Supreme Court of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
  2. Deats v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. DeFalco v. DoetschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. In re Proceedings Against Suffolk County District Court Judge Floyd SarisohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Abare v. HatchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API