Vibroplex Co. v. Jacob May Realty Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDike, J.
This action has been instituted by the plaintiff to recover the sum of $2,500, being a deposit made by the plaintiff to bind the contract of purchase of certain property at the corner of DeKalb avenue and Throop avenue, in the borough of Brooklyn, city of New York. It is contended by the plaintiff that the title is unmarketable because of certain encroachments, shown by the survey, and especially because of certain restrictions found of record against the property that was to be conveyed; the defendant taking exactly the opposite position as regards these defects and claiming that the deposit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Korn v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Acme Realty Co. v. . SchinasiNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Broadbelt v. LoewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Ungrich v. ShaffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Broadbelt v. LoewNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.