Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Town of San Mateo City v. State Ex Rel. Landis

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 6, 1934Published

1ConcurrenceDavis, C. J.

(concurring).-—I concur in the judgment of the Court and also in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Whitfield. And in view of the nature of the point involved I feel it altogether appropriate to state the reasons upon which the conclusion reached may be justifiedly supported as against the charge that the Legislature has unlawfully delegated its powers to a local referendum plebiscite.

The Legislature has undoubted power under Section 8 of Article VIII of the State Constitution to abolish the municipality of San Mateo City without a referendum. This power is conceded by the plaintiffs in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pitt v. Belate IronmongerSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Thomas, as Sheriff v. MillsSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Coarsey v. Harrison, Ct. JudgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Swanson v. TherrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API