Legal Opinion

Thames v. Mississippi Ex Rel. Shoemaker

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1941No. 9632PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

The judgments from which appeal is taken are one for $20,000 in favor of “the State of Mississippi for the use and benefit of J. E. Shoemaker, Admr. of the estate of Ray Grant” against “J. L. Thames, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company,” and one refusing to set aside this judgment for want of jurisdiction because there was no diversity of citizenship. The question of jurisdiction we have found controlling and will state the case with special reference to it.

The suit was filed in the district court in the name…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. McLean v. Mississippi Ex Rel. RoyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. Mississippi Power Co. v. ArchibaldMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Kelly v. HowardMississippi Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Long v. McKinneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Meehan v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  3. Lonnie Miller, Administrator of the Estate of Albert Miller, Jr., Deceased and Albert Miller, Sr. v. Ely J. Perry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  4. Partyka v. Yazoo Development Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Allen v. BakerDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API