Duncan, Darryl R. v. Fapso, Bernard
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Darryl Duncan contends in this pro se lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that Ber nard Fapso, a police officer in North Chicago, Illinois, violated his Fourth Amendment rights by arresting him without probable cause. Duncan argues that the district court erred in granting summary judgment for Officer Fapso, and in declining to enlist counsel to represent him at no charge. We reject both contentions and affirm the judgment.
At the outset, we note that Duncan failed to comply with Northern District of Illinois Local Rule 56.1(b)(3), which requires a party opposing a motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Devenpeck v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Van Dyke Johnson v. Stephen Doughty, Doctor, John Cearlock, Don HinderliterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Douglas v. Village of PalatineDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Jervell Barnes v. Trooper G. White, Trooper K. Krol, and Unknown and Unnamed Illinois State TroopersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026