Legal Opinion

Premier Technology v. OR. STATE LOTTERY

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 23, 1995No. 92C-10520; CA A83481Published

1Opinion of the Court

901 P.2d 883 (1995)

136 Or. App. 124

PREMIER TECHNOLOGY, an Illinois general partnership, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Oregon, By and Through the OREGON STATE LOTTERY, Respondent, and

Video Lottery Consultants, Inc., Intervenor below.

92C-10520; CA A83481.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted January 19, 1995.

Decided August 23, 1995.

John F. McGrory, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Timothy R. Volpert and Davis Wright Tremaine.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Isler v. ShuckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Glubka v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Harsh Investment Corp. v. State Ex Rel. State Housing DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Portland Adventist Medical Center v. SheffieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API