Weems v. Love Manufacturing Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
From the chancery court of Lauderdale county. The appeal in this case, which was denied by the chancery court, but was granted by the judges of the supreme court, was prosecuted by Weems and others, from the decree of the chancery court ordering them to pay into court the sum bid fox-property sold by the receiver. The opinion states the facts.
Read the full summary
From the chancery court of Lauderdale county. The appeal in this case, which was denied by the chancery court, but was granted by the judges of the supreme court, was prosecuted by Weems and others, from the decree of the chancery court ordering them to pay into court the sum bid fox-property sold by the receiver. The opinion states the facts. The assignee filed his petition as the statute requires, making the assignor and all creditors parties, and the effect was to draw to the chancery court the administration of the assets, and when the court ordered the property sold, it did so for the…
1Per curiam
On the eighth day of April, 1894, one Blalack sued out an attachment against the Queen City Manufacturing Company, and caused the same to be levied upon nearly all the real and personal property of that corporation. On the same day several other creditors also sued out attachments at law, and levied on the same property. On the ninth of April the company made a general assignment of all its property, with preferences of certain of its creditors, to Geo. N. Hodges as assignee. On that day the assignee filed a petition and bond in the chancery court of Lauderdale county, and thereby became…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Perry-Mason Shoe Co. v. SykesMississippi Supreme Court · 1894