Legal Opinion

Kiker v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 26, 1917No. 8726PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Trover; from Gordon, superior court—Judge Tarver, March 7, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.

Where a landowner enters into a contract with •another person, by the terms of which the owner is to furnish the land, stock, tools, and supplies to make a crop, and the other person is to do the labor and receive a part of the crop so made, the legal relation which exists between them is thsft of landlord and cropper. Appling v. Odom, 46 Ga. 583; Hancock v. Boggus, 111 Ga. 884 (2) (36 S. E. 970). The person employed to work for a part of the crop under such a contract is a cropper, and '“the title to the crop, subject to the interest of the cropper therein, and the possession of the land,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hays v. Jordan & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Blitch v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Appling v. OdomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Hancock v. BoggusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Medlock v. Morgan County BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  2. Cullars v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API