Legal Opinion
Miller v. Colvin
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided July 13, 2015No. CIV 14-4040PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge.
This Court referred the case to United States Magistrate for the purpose of issuing a Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge has recommended that the Commissioner’s denial -of benefits be reversed and remanded for reconsideration pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four.
A sentence four remand is proper when the district court 'makes a substantive ruling regarding the correctness of the Commissioner’s decision and remands the case in accordance with such ruling. Buckner v. Apfel, 213 F.3d 1006, 1010 (8th Cir.2000). Remand with instructions…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Kathleen Briscoe, on Behalf of Nelson Taylor, Deceased v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arevalo v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
- Burns v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
- Draeger v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2025
- Katzenmeier v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2021
- Keener v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.