Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Soileau

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1975No. 4949Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWatson, Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part) :

I concur in affirming the trial court as to damages for the land taken, but I dissent on the issue of severance damages.

I would affirm an award of severance damages in this case because the record reflects that the landowner’s remaining property has been diminished in value. This was the conclusion of the experts who testified for the defendant and their opinions were accepted by the trial court.

The weight to be given expert testimony and the function of the trial court has been -ecently described by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State, Department…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State, Department of Highways v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  2. State, Dept. of Hwys. v. Denham Springs Dev. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  3. Louisiana Power & Light Company v. DixonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. State, Dept. of Highways v. Nisbet Properties, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. State, Department of Highways v. ClementLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API