Legal Opinion

Riley v. Riley

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 20, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill is for the partition of land of Mary Riley, deceased, among her six children, the child of a deceased daughter, Katherine, and the child or a devisee of a deceased son, Michael.

The first dispute to be settled is whether the mother had title. The property at one time belonged to the son, Michael. He conveyed it to his father. Upon delivery of the deed the father declared in writing that he held the property in trust to (a) allow Michael to use it; (b) convey or mortgage it upon "the written request of the said Michael Riley under his hand and seal and endorsed on such deed or mortgage…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gerhardt v. SullivanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Phillips v. VermeuleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  3. Schenck v. SchenckNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1863
  4. Melick v. PidcockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brasko v. DuchekNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  2. Skovborg v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Speth v. SpethNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Morgan v. MurtonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API