Legal Opinion
Lauxman v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 24, 1981No. 80-55PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORFINGER, Judge.
Appellant was arrested for disorderly intoxication, an offense under a city ordinance substantially identical to section 856.-011, Florida Statutes. The search following his arrest disclosed his possession of a controlled substance. After being charged with such possession and having his motion to suppress denied, he pled nolo contendere reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress.
The record on appeal satisfies us that when arrested, appellant was intoxicated and was causing a public disturbance. State v. Holden, 299 So.2d 8 (Fla.1974); see T.L.M. v.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- T. L. M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- State v. HoldenSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Sears v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lowery v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Wesley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Meyers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981