Hinsdale v. . Thornton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
This was a Petition to Rehear, filed at this term by the plaintiff, the case between the same parties, decided at January Term last of this court, and reported in 74 N. C. Rep., in which the facts of the case are fully set out. The errors assigned in the petition, alleged as a cause of rehearing, are stated in the opinion of Chief Justice Pear-SON.
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, C. J.
We have given to the cases relied on in the petition a reconsideration, for we had considered them in making the decision, and did not deem any one of them so relevant as to call for special notice in the opinion.
The petition sets out, as a matter of grievance, that the case of Phillips v. Thompson, 73 N. C. Rep., 543, “ though it conflicts with the opinion, is not noticed.” This count sets out, as a matter of grievance, that the gentlemen of the bar, who certifj’-, upon their professional honor, an opinion that there is error, did not advert to the fact that the decision in that case was,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Phillips and Wife v. . Thompson and Wife .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gorrell v. AlspaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Gorrell v. . AlspaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Love v. . SmathersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Evans v. BrendleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Evans v. . BrendleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.