Legal Opinion
State v. DeMarco
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 12, 2010No. AC 30152PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Michael Angelo DeMarco, appeals from the judgment of conviction, following his conditional plea of nolo contendere, of two counts of cruelty to animals in violation of General Statutes § 53-247 (a).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial *440court improperly denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained by the police pursuant to a warrantless entry into his residence. Specifically, he claims that the court improperly found that the warrantless entry was justified under the emergency doctrine exception to the warrant requirement and that the court based…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LangleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. DEMARCOSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. DeMarcoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- State v. DeMarcoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. DeMarcoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014