Legal Opinion

Neet v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, P. J.

Proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to review a determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles which revoked petitioner’s operator’s license for refusal to submit to a chemical test to determine the alcoholic content of his blood following his arrest for driving while intoxicated. (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1194, subd. 1.) Concededly, petitioner declined a proper request that he consent to a blood test and, according to the arresting State trooper’s testimony, so declined more than once. It is provided in subdivision 3 of section 1192 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krueger v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. White v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. White v. MeltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Krueger v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API