(PS) Alston v. LLoyd
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC ANTHONY ALSTON, JR., No. 2:18-cv-02420-TLN-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in 19 accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Currently before the court is 20 plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a first amended complaint (“FAC”). (ECF Nos. 33, 34.) The 21 court deemed this matter…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.