Legal Opinion

Say v. Crocker First National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1929No. Docket No. 6551PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEEDHAM, J., pro tem.

This is a suit by Mary E. Say, a married woman, and wife of W. H. Say, against the defendant to quiet title to land in Fresno County. The defendant denied the title of the plaintiff, and alleged the superiority over plaintiff’s title of an attachment lien levied against the land in an action brought by the deféndant against W. H. Say, the husband of the plaintiff, Ivan Mc-Indoo and Henry. Ross. The defendant also sets up as a separate and distinct defense that a certain deed executed by W. H. Say to his wife, the plaintiff, on April 7, 1924, and recorded the same day,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoag v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Ward v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Plant v. SmytheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Zihn v. ZihnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Hillwig v. BoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Alvarado v. DavisAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931
  3. Alioto v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  4. Steel v. HadsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API