Legal Opinion

Klump v. Liebold

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 19, 1882PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. [Cited, Wright v. Williams, 25 Ky. L. 1377, 77 S. W. 1128.]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Lewis:

The evidence in this case is conclusive that appellant not only acquiesced in the erection of the column by appellee upon his side of the boundary line, but by both words and conduct intimated his consent thereto. As the division line as claimed by him was plainly described by the partition wall it is unreasonable to suppose that he, being present while the work was being done, was ignorant of the position of the column relative to that line. Not only do other witnesses besides appellee testify that *422he was present and observed the work as it progressed and expressed…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. Kentucky Glycerine CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API