John B. Lambert & Associates-Cleveland Agency, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion, filed July 19,1976, pursuant to Rule 141 (b) moving that the court adopt the recommended decision of Trial Judge John P. Wiese, filed June 9, 1976, pursuant to Rule 134 (h), as the basis for its judgment in this case since plaintiffs have filed no notice of intention to except thereto and the time for so filing pursuant to the Rules of the court has expired. Upon consideration thereof, without oral argument, since the court agrees with the said recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth,* it hereby affirms and adopts the same as the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- United States v. Donruss Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Helvering v. Chicago Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Alexander Proudfoot Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Dill Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Computervision Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Ottawa Silica Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- JJJ Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Four Star Oil & Gas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Computervision Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.