Transrisk Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of America
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:
Transrisk Corporation, Inc. (“Transrisk”), assignee of Allegheny Freight Lines (“Allegheny”), appeals from a summary judgment denying its “undercharge” claim against Mat-sushita Electric Corporation d/b/a Panasonic Company (“Panasonic”).1 Because we agree with the district court that pursuant to its *315agreement with Panasonic, Allegheny acted as a motor contract carrier, not a motor common carrier, we affirm.
I
From March through December 1989, Allegheny, an interstate motor carrier based in Virginia, transported approximately 600 shipments for a shipper, Panasonic.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Dan Barclay, Inc. v. Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Global Transportation Services, Inc. v. United Shipping Co. (In Re United Shipping Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trans-Allied Audit Company, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, United States of America, Twin Modal, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Transrisk Corporation, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Corporation Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994