Legal Opinion
United States v. Mohammad Reza Mehrmanesh, Patricia Mehrmanesh, and Abofazl Mehrmanesh
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1981No. 18-16408PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*768CANBY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents a question of interpretation of the provision of the Speedy Trial Act imposing the sanction of dismissal for violation of the Act’s time limits. 18 U.S.C. § 3163(c). Before reaching that issue, however, we are presented with a threshold question whether the denial of a motion to dismiss for violation of the Speedy Trial Act is appealable prior to final judgment. We conclude that the order is not appealable, and accordingly dismiss the appeal. We also deny defendants’ request for mandamus relief.
FACTS:
On March 20, 1980, the defendants were arrested and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Mohammad Reza MehrmaneshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Michael Lawrence PollockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. William MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.