Legal Opinion

Bank v. . Gilmer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The exceptions to the judge's remarks to the jury are without merit. Almost the same expressions were used in Osborne v. Wilkes, 108 N.C. 651, and were found unobjectionable on appeal, citing Hannon v. Grizzard,89 N.C. 115. Nor was there error in continuing the term to conclude the trial or to receive the verdict. This is authorized as to felonies by The Code, sec. 1229 (S. v. Adair,66 N.C. 298) and was extended to all other cases by chapter 226, Laws 1893, except that it would not apply to civil cases begun after (701) Thursday of the last week of the term. The trial of this action began on…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Clarke v. Boorman's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. McLeod v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Austin v. . StatenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Helms v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Osborne v. . WilkesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Crab Orchard Development CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Edwards v. Northwestern BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. ChiarelloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Odom v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Judkins v. JudkinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API