Legal Opinion

Houghtaling v. Seminole Tribe of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 7, 1993No. 79177PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

611 So.2d 1235 (1993)

Carole Francis HOUGHTALING, Petitioner,

v.

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

No. 79177.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 7, 1993.

H. Irene Higginbotham and Mary E. Mann of Acosta & Mann, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.

W. Douglas Berry and Melinda J. Brazel of Butler, Burnett & Pappas, Tampa, and Donald A. Orlovsky of Kamen & Orlovsky, P.A., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Kimberly Sands, Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers, Daytona Beach, amicus curiae for Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers.

OVERTON, Justice.

We have for review Seminole Tribe v. Houghtaling, 589 So.2d 1030 (Fla.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Atkinson v. HaldaneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sac & Fox Nation v. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. McCorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Sac and Fox Nation v. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Mancher v. Seminole Tribe of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. Federico v. Capital Gaming International, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API