Hegarty v. American Com. Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
THE CHANCELLOR.
Facts are shown from which I conclude that at the time of the transactions hereinafter referred to, the respondent, the Power Company, which is now in receivership, controlled and dominated the Gas Company, the petitioner. Sundry intercorporate relations of creditor and debtor had been created prior to March 25, 1931, between each of these companies, and also between the respondent and others, certain of which were subsidiaries of the petitioner.
The stipulation of facts shows that as of March 31, 1931, the following transactions were put through by the petitioner and the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gay v. OsborneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Tootle v. First Natl. BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Sisson, Potter & Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1891
- John V. Farwell Co. v. HiltonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amgine Technologies (US), Inc. v. Harold Roy MillerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2021
- Exotics Hawaii-Kona, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Griggs v. E. I. DuPontCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- IN RE Tesla, Inc. Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025
- The Ravenswood Investment Company, L.P. v. The Estate of Bassett S. WinmillCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.