Legal Opinion

Nichols v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 19, 2002No. 1D99-1450Published

1Per curiam

Appellant, Fedell Tobias Nichols, claims error in the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. Appellant was charged with armed robbery and armed kidnapping. The jury found him guilty of armed robbery and armed false imprisonment, a lesser included offense. Because a review of the record establishes that the evidence at trial was sufficient to support a conviction for false imprisonment, as a matter of law, we affirm. See Davis v. State, 816 So.2d 840 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Appellant further claims error in the trial court’s imposition of consecutive habitual offender…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Sinks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Kinsey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API