Legal Opinion

Fargo v. Paul

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion for substitution of attorneys.

1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.

Upon the first trial, the jury rendered a verdict for the defendant. The trial judge set this verdict aside as against the weight of evidence. An appeal was taken by the defendant to the Appellate Division, and the order setting aside the verdict was . sustained. George W. Fuller was attorney for the defendant, and Hon. Charles A. Kellogg had acted as counsel, both upon the trial and upon the appeal. The new trial ordered by the trial judge having been sustained by the Appellate Division, and the defendant’s attorney and his counsel having paid out more money than they had received, refused…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Halbert v. GibbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Tuck v. ManningNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re WoodworthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. Hoffstaetter v. SchinkelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. In Re WoodworthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API