Legal Opinion

Croft v. Steele

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1837PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the common pleas of 3%jette county. John Steele and William Steele agailst George Croft, late sheriff of Fayette county. This was an action of debt, to recover money made by the sale of the real estate of John Cannon, under the circumstances which are fully stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Huston, J.

The following is a statement of the facts in this case as they were presented to us. Daniel Cannon, the elder, died seised of lands in Fayette county. Upon a proceeding in the orphans’ court, and a valuation of his lands, a tract was taken at the appraisement by his son John Cannon, who, on the 27th of March 1798, entered into recognizance to pay their respective proportions to each of his brothers and sisters; Isabella, one of the sisters, married John Witherow, John and William Steele obtained a judgment against John Cannon the younger, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hess v. HeebleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1820
  2. Wilson v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1823

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carl v. KnottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  2. Converse v. ColtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API