State v. O'Connell
Supreme Court of Kansas
At the April Term, 1883, of the district court of Wyandotte county, William O’Connell was found guilty of selling intoxicating liquors without a permit, and sentenced to pay a fine of $100, and the costs of the prosecution. He appeals. Thg facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Per curiam
The defendant in this case was charged with selling intoxicating liquors without a permit, and was found guilty, and fined $100, and adjudged to pay the costs of suit. The trial was had before the court and a jury. After all the evidence on the part of the state was introduced, the defendant moved the court to require that the state elect upon which transaction under the evidence it would rely for a conviction, and the court sustained the motion, and the state then elected in the following manner, to wit: “The state for a conviction relies upon a sale of intoxicating liquor by defendant to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GuettlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- State v. MoultonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- State v. BrowningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- State v. TudorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926