Finley v. Chicago, Aurora & Elgin Railway Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Feinberg
Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action for personal injuries. The only question presented upon this appeal is: Should the trial court have directed a verdict for the defendant at the close of all the evidence or entered judgment non obstante veredicto on the ground that, as a matter of law, (1) the relation of carrier and passenger between plaintiff and defendant did not exist; and (2) that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence?
Upon this question we must consider only the evidence most favorable to plaintiff and every favorable, reasonable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Chicago Street Railroad v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Illinois Central Railroad v. O'KeefeIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- South Chicago City Railway Co. v. DufresneIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- North Chicago Street Railroad v. KaspersIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Klinck v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Forshey v. JohnstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971