Legal Opinion

Branch v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 9, 1986No. 53, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Because of a substantial variation between the description initially given of a robber and that of the actual description of the defendant it is here contended that there was insufficient evidence to convict. We shall hold to the contrary. Hence, we shall affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals.

Beatrice Mudge was robbed by two black males at approximately 7:15 a.m. on April 14,1983, while enroute to her employment at The Johns Hopkins Hospital. She immediately reported the incident to security at the hospital who called the Baltimore City Police. At approximately 8:30…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Basoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Shelton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Bloodsworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Moye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Derr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API