Legal Opinion

Richert v. Handly

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1958No. 34573PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

This is an action for an accounting and dissolution of a logging partnership.

On the first appeal of this cause, which is reported in 50 Wn. (2d) 356, 311 P. (2d) 417 (1957), the appellant Richert failed to assign as error any of the findings of fact made by the trial court and, therefore, they became the established facts of the case. Rule on Appeal 43, 34A Wn. (2d) 47, as amended, effective January 2, 1953. However, we stated therein:

“. . . it is manifest that the findings are inadequate to support the judgment entered, or any other judgment. There is a finding that the parties to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richert v. HandlyWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Morrison v. UlticanWashington Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Century Universal Enterprises, Inc. v. Triana Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. Armand DeFelice v. State of Washington, Employment Security Dept.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. DeFelice v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API