Legal Opinion
Allied Supplier & Erection, Inc. v. A. Baldwin & Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided February 7, 1985No. 09-83-171 CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKSHIRE, Justice.
This appeal is from a judgment rendered after a bench trial. Appellee, A. Baldwin & Company, Inc. (Baldwin), plaintiff below, filed suit on two promissory installment notes based on valuable consideration and dated July 5, 1979, and October 20, 1980. The defendants were Allied Supplier and Erection, Inc. (Allied), William C. Key and Chris Maida. Recovery was sought for a 10% attorney’s fee as provided for in the promissory notes. Recovery was additionally sought against Key and Maida based on documents entitled “Absolute Guaranty of Payment of Promissory Note”.
Appell…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mays v. PierceTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Universal Metals & MacHinery, Inc. v. BohartTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- RepublicBank Dallas, N.A. v. ShookTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Rimco Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas Electric Service Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Houston Furniture Distributors, Inc. v. Bank of Woodlake, N. A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.