Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2005No. 04-1425, 04-1590Unpublished

1DissentBatchelder, J.

I respectfully dissent because, unlike the majority, I do not think that substantial evidence supports the NLRB’s conclusion that the statements contained in Question #22 interfered with the employees’ right to elect a labor union. In the days leading up to the election, Todd Lemke, the General Manager of Cooper’s Cedar Rapids warehouse, prepared two question-and-answer style memoranda (dated January 17, 2003 and January 27, 2003) for distribution to the employees. The NLRB found that the twenty-second question and answer in the second memo violated section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Superior Coatings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. V. & S Schuler Engineering, Inc., United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio/clc, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. First Healthcare Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API