Murphy v. Henry
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Martin Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.
The appellants commenced in the court below a proceeding against the appellees for the partition of certain real estate.
The facts necessary to a proper understanding of the question involved are these: that Macon Henry, Sr., departed this life, intestate, and seized of the land in controversy; that he left to survive him his widow, Sarah Henry, and Macon Henry, Jr., who was his only child; that afterwards Sarah Henry departed this life, intestate, and left surviving her Macon Henry, Jr., who was her only child; that afterwards, Macon Henry, Jr., departed this life, intestate, and without…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gardner v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Martindale v. MartindaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Leard v. LeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- Frantz v. HarrowIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Ogle v. StoopsIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cloud v. BruceIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- O'Harra v. StoneIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Heavenridge v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Purcell v. SewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Small v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.