Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Henry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1871PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from the Martin Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

The appellants commenced in the court below a proceeding against the appellees for the partition of certain real estate.

The facts necessary to a proper understanding of the question involved are these: that Macon Henry, Sr., departed this life, intestate, and seized of the land in controversy; that he left to survive him his widow, Sarah Henry, and Macon Henry, Jr., who was his only child; that afterwards Sarah Henry departed this life, intestate, and left surviving her Macon Henry, Jr., who was her only child; that afterwards, Macon Henry, Jr., departed this life, intestate, and without…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gardner v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Martindale v. MartindaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Leard v. LeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Frantz v. HarrowIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Ogle v. StoopsIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cloud v. BruceIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. O'Harra v. StoneIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Heavenridge v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Purcell v. SewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Small v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API