Sinard v. Gleason
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wapello District Court. On the 27th day of July, 1862, plaintiff recovered against the defendant a judgment for $41.53. April the 17th, 1863, an execution was issued on this judgment, and returned nulla Iona. On the 2d day of May, 1863, a garnishment was served on Isaac Millisack, against whom, having appeared and answered, a judgment was rendered for the amount of plaintiff’s judgment claim against Gleason.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Wapello District Court. On the 27th day of July, 1862, plaintiff recovered against the defendant a judgment for $41.53. April the 17th, 1863, an execution was issued on this judgment, and returned nulla Iona. On the 2d day of May, 1863, a garnishment was served on Isaac Millisack, against whom, having appeared and answered, a judgment was rendered for the amount of plaintiff’s judgment claim against Gleason. From this judgment Gleason appealed to the District Court, where the case was again tried by the court without a jury, and the garnishee discharged, and a judgment rendered…
1Opinion of the CourtLowe, J.
i. gaknishappeal,
In the state of the record, the only question reserved for our determination is, whether the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. The motion was made upon the alleged ground that the decision of the court was against law and evidence. Whether this is so or not we have no. means of determining. Neither the answer of the garnishee or any evidence is certified up to us. There is in the transcript a set of interrogatories and answers, purporting to be questions and *166answers put to and given'by Isaac Millisack, the garnishee. It does not appear that they were…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Giesy-Walker Co. v. BriggsUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- State Savings Bank v. Guaranty Abstract Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915