Legal Opinion

Kemper v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 19, 2007No. 07SA201PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

In this appeal pursuant to section 1-40-107(2), C.R.S. (2007), two registered electors, Douglas Kemper and Stuart Sanderson (collectively, "Kemper"), challenge the action of the Title Board in setting the title, ballot title, and submission clause ("titles") for proposed Initiative 2007-2008 #17 (unofficially captioned by legislative staff, for tracking purposes, "New State Department and Elected Board for Public Resource Conservation").1

The initiative's proponents contend that the measure proposes only the creation of a new Colorado Department of Environmental Conservation with a mission of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. PolhillSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. Gonzalez-Estay v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. Matter of Prop. Initiative on Water RightsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. State v. RobbinsOregon Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Developmental Pathways v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  2. In the Matter of Title, Submission Clause for 2009-2010 91Supreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  3. Title, Ballot Title, & Submission Clause for 2011-2012 3 v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  4. Cordero v. LeahySupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  5. In the Matter of Submission Clause for 2009-2010 No. 45Supreme Court of Colorado · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API