Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Reynolds

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action to recover money on deposit in the Albany Savings Bank "in the naine of Frances E." Oon'ant, the plaintiffs claiming .that they are the owners of the deposit by a gift omisa mortis from • Frances E. .Gonant.

1Opinion of the CourtChase, J.

Frances E. Conant, a resident of Valatie, N. Y., died at Malden, Mass., on the 3d day of May, 1896. She was an unmarried woman and her nearest relative and only next of kin was an aunt, Eliza R. Brewer, residing at Dallas, Texas. The plaintiff ' Clarence N. Reynolds was a relative of deceased, though not a next of kin, and the plaintiff Sarah W. Reynolds was and is the wife of the plaintiff Clarence N. Reynolds and they reside at Malden, Mass. The plaintiff Clarence N. Reynolds, when a child, lived for some years with Frances E. Conant in the family of her mother. Frances E. Conant prior to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ridden v. . ThrallNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Southard v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Lewis v. . MerrittNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Fassin v. . HubbardNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Vilmar v. . SchallNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CaraherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  2. In re the Estate of SullivanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  3. Gilkinson v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Hixson v. RodbournNew York Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API