Rudd v. Danville Metal Stamping Co., Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann
Plaintiff, Raymond E. Rudd (Rudd), brought this action against defendant, Danville Metal Stamping Co., Inc. (DMS), claiming breach of an alleged employment contract between him and DMS. Rudd claims that language appearing in DMS’s employee handbook created an enforceable contract binding DMS to certain procedures before it could terminate Rudd’s employment. The trial court found that DMS’s employee handbook did not create a contract and dismissed Rudd’s complaint with prejudice under section 2 — 615 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2 — 615).…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Duldulao v. Saint Mary of Nazareth Hospital CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Koch v. Illinois Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Tolbert v. St. Francis Extended Care CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
3Cited by11 opinions
- Janda v. United States Cellular Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Robinson v. Christopher Greater Area Rural Health Planning Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Janda v. US Cellular Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Spann v. Springfield ClinicAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Frank v. South Suburban Hospital FoundationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.