Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Escude

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1966No. 1809PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

This case is before us on supervisory writs. In this tort action the defendants-*466relators complain of the trial court’s refusal to continue the jury trial of the cause scheduled for June 20, 1966. They contend that they have been effectively deprived of the opportunity to prepare their defense against the plaintiff Lindsey’s personal injury claim because of his failure to submit to a court-ordered medical examination. Upon a showing of substantial prejudice and what we felt to be an abuse of discretion in failing to continue the trial, we granted certiorari and stayed further…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. EscudeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Chedotal v. RichardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sauce v. BussellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  2. Powell v. GiddensLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Matthews v. MatthewsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Evans v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Superior Oil Co. v. Van BreemenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API