Legal Opinion
Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff's Department
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 4, 1992No. C1-91-2237PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellants brought this case to recover damages incurred as a result of respondent’s failure to inform appellants of the availability of benefits under the Crime Victims Reparations Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 611A.51-.67 (1990), within the Act’s one-year statute of limitation. The trial court awarded summary judgment for respondent, concluding that the Act imposed no actionable duty upon respondent. Appellants contend the trial court’s interpretation of the statute is erroneous.
FACTS
On June 20, 1988, Faribault County authorities were notified that a four-year old child had been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoffert v. Owatonna Inn Towne Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Lorshbough v. Township of BuzzleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Jeffers v. Convoy Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- In re ClarkOhio Court of Claims · 1983
- Petition of Oakgrove on Behalf of OakgroveCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Larsen v. Wright County Human Service Agency-Day Care DivisionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995