Legal Opinion

Hetronic International, Inc. v. Rempe

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 31, 2017No. 16-6307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Monroe G. McKay, Circuit Judge

Plaintiff Hetronic International, Inc., appeals the district court’s denial of its request for attorneys’ fees qua compensatory damages. Plaintiff had sued Defendants Torsten Rempe and AZ CS Inc. for, among other things, breach of employment contract, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference, conspiracy, fraud, and unfair competition. Defendants defaulted, and the district court set a hearing on damages. In a brief filed prior to the hearing, Plaintiff explained that it sought $4.4 million in actual damages, including $3.1 million for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. United States ex rel. C.J.C., Inc. v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Security State Bank of Comanche v. W. R. Johnston & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Griffin v. BredouwSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hetronic International Inc v. Hetronic Germany GMBHDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
  2. PetSmart, Inc. v. Dancor Construction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API