Haller v. Willamowicz
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court. Hon. H. F. Fairchild, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice CoMptoN
This was a bill by Haller against Willamowcz, for an account of their dealings as co-partners in the tanning business. At the final hearing a decree for $583 18 was rendered against Haller, from which he appealed.
In the court below, several exceptions were taken, which are relied on here as grounds for a reversal; and in the order in which we propose to consider them, the first to be noticed is a claim urged by Haller for damages sustained by the co-partnership, in consequence of the alleged misconduct of Willamowicz.
By the articles of co-partnership it was stipulated that Haller — who was a…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. OldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Alderman v. NobleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Grabowski v. BenzsaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Lester v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Gong v. ToyOregon Supreme Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.