Legal Opinion
Wittenberg v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 22, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appeal taken as of right dismissed upon the ground that no *755substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Plaintiffs’ application for leave to appeal granted. Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (135 AD2d 132; see also, Matter of Replan Dev. v Department of Hous. Preservation & Dev., 70 NY2d 451).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Replan Development, Inc. v. Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Wittenberg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vast Goed v. Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- JAMES SQUARE ASSOCIATES LP v. MULLEN, DENNISAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Saratoga Water Services, Inc. v. Saratoga County Water AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Litod Paper Stock Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Lombardo v. SantevecchiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1996