Isaacson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by • defendant, the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company, from an order of the district court for Freeborn county, Farmer, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
Action for trespass upon plaintiff’s land. The damage alleged in the complaint was the trampling upon and spoiling grain growing on the land. Plaintiff had a verdict, assessing his damage at $161.50. The objections made here to the verdict are that it includes items of damage other than that specifically mentioned in the complaint *464—to wit, to grain — and that the court erred in charging the jury that they might consider other items of damage proved. The court did so charge, and as each of defendant’s requests refused by the court contained a proposition excluding such other items, the charge…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Beach v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Bowman v. EppingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
- Fenner v. Crips Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Hart v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Thoreson v. Minneapolis Harvester WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.