Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2026No. 25AP-163Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Dixon,

2026-Ohio-570.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Marvell Dixon, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 25AP-163 v. : (C.P.C. No. 22CV-5888) State of Ohio, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellee. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on February 19, 2026 On brief: Carpenter Lipps, LLP, Kort Gatterdam, and Michael Rogers, for appellant. Argued: Michael Rogers. On brief: Dave Yost, Attorney General, Andrew Gatti, Salvatore P. Messina, and Daniel H. Huston, for appellee. Argued: Andrew Gatti. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas DORRIAN, J. {¶ 1}…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Turner v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API